Seaworthiness Act

Corpus Christi Seaworthiness Act Attorneys

Seeking Fair Compensation for Injured Clients in Nueces County

For incidents and accidents occurring in a maritime environment, maritime law (otherwise used interchangeably at times with admiralty law) will dictate the procedures and pathway for resolving civil disputes emanating from negligence on the high seas. Maritime law remains, to this day, a unique facet of the total American legal system, featuring federal jurisdiction for nearly all claims originating on the high seas, for plaintiffs and defendants embroiled in litigation relating to an offshore incident, maritime law becomes highly complex. It is also oftentimes subject to practically unwritten laws and regulations applicable to the sea.

The basis of unseaworthiness claims essentially rests on the foundational notions found in the traditional laws of the sea that a captain or vessel owner is ultimately liable should a craft or vessel be found by admiralty courts to be unseaworthy, later causing injuries to passengers or crew. This duty of seaworthiness has an evolved legal history in the United States; however, when considering whether or not to file claims under the seaworthiness-related act, drawing from case law will prove helpful.

If you were injured aboard an “unseaworthy” vessel, it is crucial that you speak to an experienced Corpus Christi Seaworthiness Act attorney at Bandas Law Firm, P.C. Call (361) 238-2789 today.

Determining Unseaworthiness Broadly, Per the U.S. Supreme Court

Per the McFadden v. Blue Star Line (1905), the bar for assigning negligence liability to a vessel owner or captain asks whether a prudent vessel owner or captain would have gauged or assessed the prudent level of seaworthiness of a given ship immediately before a given accident or incident.

Implied Warranties of Seaworthiness Found in U.S. Law

With a maritime law tradition stretching back several centuries, a formal foundation of maritime obligations under the seaworthiness doctrine lacked formal codification in the U.S. until the turn of the 20th century. Under the 1906 Marine Insurance Act, which sought to provide comparable protections to maritime workers in the workplace commensurate with those conferred upon continental workers, section 39.1 holds that there exists an implied warranty in any maritime transit that holds that vessel owners and captains can be held liable for bringing out to sea on voyage a vessel that is unseaworthy for the proposed and likely dangers of the maritime route ahead.

Further augmenting this seaworthiness-related act are international maritime laws Section 3 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act of 1971 and Rule one (1) of Article (3) of The Hague-Visby Rules, which, in short, collectively provide for explicit requirements for vessel owners and employers to make ships seaworthy, provide ample crew and supplies for the voyage forthcoming, and provide a litany of other protections for passengers, travelers, and even cargo.

Finding Appropriate Legal Remedies under the Seaworthiness Law

Should an injured party from a maritime incident seek to remedy their outstanding damages, filing claims in civil court under the doctrine of seaworthiness may be a viable solution.

With jurisdiction and venue most likely under U.S. maritime law and in U.S. admiralty courts, and specific rules applicable to claims filed under the seaworthiness doctrines, the following individuals should potentially exhaust their legal options under the following principles or forums before considering filing suit under seaworthiness doctrines applicable in modernity:

  • Any maritime death, including those of passengers, crewmembers, or other personnel on the vessel, would likely find an appropriate forum under the Death on the High Seas Act
  • Injured maritime workers working predominantly at sea on a ship would probably first consider filing claims under the Jones Act, which, once resolved, may require filing an additional civil suit against liable parties to recover additional or uncompensated damages
  • Injured harbor or longshoreman workers would also file claims and go through the compensation process found under the seaworthiness implied doctrines found in the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act

Finally, determinations of negligence are highly predicated on case-specific factors and, as such, determining whether real negligence or breach of the duty of seaworthiness owed must be scrutinized carefully in the context of the case prior to filling, as certain routes to compensation for losses at sea noted above do not force plaintiffs or claimants to meet a traditional civil burden of proof to establish negligence, yet still provide compensation benefits.

Attributes of Claims Filed under Doctrine of Seaworthiness

If a claims case is ultimately pursued under the grounds of a breach of the seaworthiness doctrine, plaintiffs have only three years to formally file suit under maritime law statutes of limitation. If unmet, the plaintiff’s ability to recover damages is essentially vitiated. Secondly, any claims cases under the seaworthiness doctrine will not provide plaintiffs the option to a jury trial. Third, claims emanating as wrongful death or relating to injuries sustained by crewmember or seamen most likely will incur a relatively short two-year statute of limitations period.

However, one of the main attractions of filing claims under the seaworthiness doctrine stems from the ability of most plaintiffs, should their case-specific context warrant it, to recover larger categories of damages. Specifically, both economic and non-economic claims can be made, with further expansion of damage awards potentially recoverable in cases of workers injured, whose workers’ compensation or Jones Act-related claims failed to make the individual whole again in terms of the financial damages sustained as part of their employment.

Contact Bandas Law Firm, P.C. online or by phone at (361) 238-2789 for a free consultation with one of our knowledgeable Seaworthiness Act attorneys in Corpus Christi.

Real Clients Share Their Success Stories

  • Bandas Law Firm was there for my husband 100%.

    “Bandas Law Firm was there for my husband 100%.”

    - Lupita L.
  • Would recommend to everyone.

    “Handled my case in a timely manner. Staff was very helpful and answered all questions I had. Would recommend to everyone.”

    - Brandi E.
  • Very pleased with Mr. Sigler’s representation in our case

    “Very pleased with Mr. Sigler’s representation in our case. He was fully prepared and had the facts ready for the court. The judge even commented Mr. Sigler was the most professional of attorneys who ...”

    - Gordon L.
  • Mr. Sigler and all his staff are awesome!

    “I have been a client of theirs for a few years and they have done a great job.”

    - Jesse L.
  • Jan kept me informed and up to date about the case.

    “I was considering my classic car a total loss until my sister-in-law told me to call Bandas Law Firm. I've never had to deal with a law firm before but Jan made the experience painless and easy to understand!”

    - Previous Client
/
  • American Association for Justice
  • Better Business Bureau Accredited Business
  • AV Preeminent® rating by Martindale-Hubbell®
  • American Board of Trial Advocates
  • American Bar Association
  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum
  • Texas Trial Lawyers Association

What Makes Us Different

  • Experienced and Proven Trial Lawyers
  • We Are Available 24/7
  • Se Habla Español
  • Work Directly With An Attorney
  • No Case Is Too Big Or Too Small
  • You Won't Pay A Dime, Unless We Win Your Case

Contact Us Today!

You have a choice in South Texas, let Bandas Law Firm help you. 

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.